Here is my synthesis presentation from the last class:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1fOwSTJso0wl8xie4Z0gE3_1sCCRWuM_5Lxn4pJYmAxk/edit?usp=sharing
0 Comments
Facebook was opened up to non-Ivy league schools right at the end of my freshman year of college. I have participated on it for eight years, and I honestly have a very love/hate relationship with it. Having lived in the valley for 12 years, and being exposed to all the peer pressure and technology in it, I have tried Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn, Pinterest, Blogger, Diigo, friendster, foursquare, and Google+ (just to name a few) with varying degrees of success.
On the one hand, I love the “social” aspect of it: staying in touch with old friends, sharing information with geographically distant family members and crowdsourcing advice about random things. On the other hand, I don’t love the politics, digital Mommy Wars, keeping up with the Jones, fakebooking and cyberbullying that always lurks somewhere within my feeds. These pros and cons must be weighed when encouraging students to participate in social media in a learning environment. Parents entrust their educational institutes with their most precious asset, their children. Just as we are expected to provide a safe environment that fosters growth, learning, and creativity, we have an equally larger responsibility in what we expose our students to. Introducing students to any aspect of social media requires just as much thought or planning as any other lesson plan or field trip. There are logistics, safety concerns, and learning objectives to be considered. You can just dump Twitter into class and hope it all turns out fine. Social media can be a learning tool, but it must be used with thought and care. This infographic represents the work required to create a traditional differentiated curriculum versus a Universal Design for Learning curriculum.
Here is the link to my lesson Plan:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XCIPQtOYEimBr9WL8gE-KXmlkt2RjCyFY2TJNnGXP-s/edit?usp=sharing My Screencast Video: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-KAr7ovht8yRE9HVVgwQmZ1VWc/view?usp=sharing One tool that I have started using only in the last month, and with great success, is Kahoot. https://kahoot.it/#/ I learned about Kahoot from a student, who used it in a fun activity. I immediately saw how effective it could be in an educational format. Kahoot is an online, interactive quiz. The quiz is designed by the teacher, students log on (either as individuals or in teams) and answer multiple choice questions. Questions can be timed, scored, and discussed. There is also a survey mode and a discussion mode. This tool is great from a few angles. The students get really involved. There is something about bright colors and points that gets students going. It is a great way to instigate conversation. The teacher has the power to make the game pause or move on. If you ask a difficult question and students get it wrong, they want to know why. It is a great place to discuss questions with nuance and layers. The multiple-choice quizzes are a great feature for reviewing reading homework from the night before and prepping for a test. I use Kahoot to start classes after assigning 1-2 chapters of reading the night before. I find the discussion feature pointless. It only allows for two choices, which is too guided for my taste. I would like it better if the students were able to discuss and input a paragraph that were could read aloud and discuss. A great strength of this app is that it provides detailed reports. Then, I am able to assure the students that their Kahoot “game” is for a grade, either classwork or quiz grade, depending on the material. This leads to very strong participation and a great way for me to check for understanding. It was also extremely easy to learn. I saw it used in class, went home that night and played with it, and had made my own and executed it at the end of the week. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
May 2016
Categories |